Skip Navigation



The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access published online on June 8, 2006
The World Bank Economic Review, doi:10.1093/wber/lhl001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/309    most recent
lhl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carstensen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gundlach, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

The Primacy of Institutions Reconsidered: Direct Income Effects of Malaria Prevalence

Kai Carstensen 1 * and Erich Gundlach 1

1 Research fellows at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kai Carstensen, E-mail: kai.carstensen{at}ifw-kiel.de


  Abstract

Some recent empirical studies deny any direct effect of geography on development and conclude that institutions dominate all other potential determinants of development. An alternative view emphasizes that geographic factors such as disease ecology, as proxied by the prevalence of malaria, may have a large negative effect on income, independent of the quality of a country’s institutions. For instance, pandemic malaria may create a large economic burden beyond medical costs and forgone earnings by affecting household behavior and such macroeconomic variables as international investment and trade. After controlling for institutional quality, malaria prevalence is found to cause quantitatively important negative effects on income. The robustness of this finding is checked by employing alternative instrumental variables, tests of overidentification restrictions, and tests of the validity of the point estimates and standard errors in the presence of weak instruments. The baseline findings appear to be robust to using alternative specifications, instrumentations, and samples. The reported estimates suggest that good institutions may be necessary but not sufficient for generating a persistent process of successful economic development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Afr EconHome page
S. Bhattacharyya
Root Causes of African Underdevelopment
J. Afr. Econ., November 1, 2009; 18(5): 745 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
M. Bosker and H. Garretsen
Economic development and the geography of institutions
J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2009; 9(3): 295 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
P. S. Rafiqui
Evolving economic landscapes: why new institutional economics matters for economic geography
J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2009; 9(3): 329 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Afr EconHome page
C. Bodea and I. A. Elbadawi
Political Violence and Underdevelopment
J. Afr. Econ., January 1, 2008; 17(suppl_2): ii50 - ii96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 28, 2006; 333(7574): 926 - 926.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.