Skip Navigation



The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access published online on December 23, 2005
The World Bank Economic Review, doi:10.1093/wber/lhi018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/345    most recent
lhi018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aroca, P.
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Article

Spatial Dimensions of Trade Liberalization and Economic Convergence: Mexico 1985-2002

Patricio Aroca 1 *, Mariano Bosch 2, and William F. Maloney 3

1 Patricio Aroca is a professor and director of the Institute for Applied Regional Economy (IDEAR) at the Universidad Cato'lica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
2 Mariano Bosch is a PhD student in economics at the London School of Economics and Political Science
3 William F. Maloney is a lead economist in the Office of the Chief Economist for Latin America at the World Bank

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Patricio Aroca, E-mail: paroca{at}ucn.cl


  Abstract

This article employs established techniques from the spatial economics literature to identify regional patterns of income and growth in Mexico and to examine how they have changed over the period spanned by trade liberalization and how they may be linked to the income divergence observed following liberalization. The article first shows that divergence has emerged in the form of several income clusters that only partially correspond to traditional geographic regions. Next, when regions are defined by spatial correlation in incomes, a ‘‘south’’ clearly exists, but the ‘‘north’’ seems to be restricted to the states directly on the U.S. border and there is no ‘‘center’’ region. Overall, the principal dynamic of both the increased spatial dependency and the increased divergence lies not on the border but in the sustained underperformance of the southern states, starting before the North American Free-Trade Agreement, and to a lesser extent in the superior performance of an emerging convergence club in the north-center of the country.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.