Skip Navigation



The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access published online on May 25, 2008

The World Bank Economic Review, doi:10.1093/wber/lhn008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/233    most recent
lhn008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comprehensive Wealth and Future Consumption: Accounting for Population Growth

Susana Ferreira, Kirk Hamilton, and Jeffrey R. Vincent

Correspondence: Email address is susana.ferreira{at}ucd.ie

JEL codes: O40, Q01, C33

Economic theory predicts that the current change in national wealth, broadly defined to include natural and human capital as well as produced capital ("genuine savings"), determines whether the present value of future changes in consumption is positive or negative. Theoretical research has focused on the effects of population growth on this relation, but no rigorous empirical investigation has been conducted. Panel data for 64 developing countries during 1970–82 are used to test the effects of three adjustments for population growth, including one that controls for omitted wealth. Although the adjustments have substantial impacts on estimates of genuine savings, they lead to only limited improvements in the relation between those estimates and subsequent consumption changes. Even without adjustments for population growth, adjustments for natural resource depletion improve the relation significantly. Policymakers and economists can interpret published estimates of genuine savings as signals of future consumption paths if and only if the estimates include adjustments for natural resource depletion. But better estimates of capital stocks are needed before it can be confidently said that adjustments for population growth significantly improve the accuracy of those signals.


Susana Ferreira is a lecturer in the School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Policy at University College Dublin; Kirk Hamilton (corresponding author) is a lead environmental economist in the Environment Department of the World Bank; his email address is khamilton{at}worldbank.org. Jeffrey R. Vincent is a professor in the Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University; his email address is jrv6{at}duke.edu. The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of three reviewers and the journal editor. Supplemental appendixes to this article are available at http://wber.oxfordjournals.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.