Skip Navigation



The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access published online on February 7, 2008

The World Bank Economic Review, doi:10.1093/wber/lhm024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/113    most recent
lhm024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elbadawi, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt-Hebbel, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Foreign Aid, the Real Exchange Rate, and Economic Growth in the Aftermath of Civil Wars

Ibrahim A. Elbadawi, Linda Kaltani, and Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel

JEL codes: F5, F3, F43

Foreign aid, the real exchange rate (RER), and economic growth are three key variables that shape the aftermath of civil wars in many developing countries. Panel estimations drawn from a sample of 39 conflict and 44 nonconflict countries between 1970 and 2004 indicate that although postconflict countries receive larger aid flows and exhibit moderate RER overvaluation after peace is attained, overvaluation cannot be traced to aid. Yet foreign aid is among the significant determinants of the equilibrium RER. Aid is also an important determinant of economic growth, particularly after peace is reached. Aid exhibits decreasing returns, however, and interacts negatively with RER overvaluation. RER overvaluation reduces growth, but this effect is ameliorated by financial development. Postconflict policies should therefore aim to use aid prudently, avoid RER misalignment, and support financial and capital market development to achieve high and stable growth in the aftermath of war and beyond.


Ibrahim Elbadawi (corresponding author) is a lead economist in the Development Economics Research Group of the World Bank; his email address is ielbadawi{at}worldbank.org. Linda Kaltani is an economist at the International Monetary Fund; her email address is lkaltani{at}imf.org. Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel is professor of economics at the Catholic University of Chile; his email address is kschmidt{at}bcentral.cl. A preliminary version of this article was presented at the first collaborative research project workshop, "Political Institutions, Development and a Domestic Civil Peace," held in Oslo, June 19–20, 2006. The conference was organized by the Development Economic Research Group of the World Bank; the Centre for the Studies of African Economies, at the University of Oxford; and the International Peace Research Institute (PRIO), Oslo. The authors thank Majak d'Agoot, Paul Collier, Jim de Melo, and workshop attendants for valuable comments and suggestions. Ibrahim Elbadawi and Linda Kaltani also thank Aart Kraay and Norman Loayza for helpful discussions. The authors acknowledge the valuable research support of Nahla Hilmi and Marcelo Ochoa. They are indebted to the editor and three anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.