Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feltenstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ha, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H54 - Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock
Right arrow O16 - Economic Development: Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

The Role of Infrastructure in Mexican Economic Reform

Andrew Feltenstein and Jiming Ha

Andrew Feltenstein is with the Department of Economics at the University of Kansas, and Jimming Ha is with the Europe II Department of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The research for this article was supported by a World Bank grant for the Infrastructure Inadequacies Project in Mexico. The authors would like to thank Frank Lysy and Daniel Ocks for their comments and assistance and Neil Roger for originally proposing the topic and offering continuous guidance.

This article estimates the relationship between the provision of public infrastructure and private output in sixteen sectors in Mexico. The sector-specific cost functions depend on wages, the cost of capital, and the nominal values of the stocks of three types of infrastructure: electricity, transport, and communications. The article concludes that infrastructure in electricity and communications generally reduces the cost of sectoral production, but transportation infrastructure tends to increase costs of sectoral production. It appears that Mexican public expenditure on electricity and communications has enhanced the productivity of private production, but expenditure on transport may actually have had a detrimental effect on private output. In addition, although in general labor and infrastructure are substitutes, in the case of electricity and communications infrastructure, capital and infrastructure are complements. In the case of transport infrastructure these conclusions are reversed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
A. N. Uhegbu
Constraints on the Formulation and Implementation of National Information Policy for Nigeria
Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2004; 30(1): 41 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.