Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cukierman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Liviatan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E31 - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

The Dynamics of Optimal Gradual Stabilizations

Alex Cukierman and Nissan Liviatan

Alex Cukierman is with the Department of Economics at Tel Aviv University, and Nissan Liviatan is with the Department of Economics at Hebrew University and the Country Economics Department at the World Bank. A previous version of the paper was presented at the September 1991 European meeting of the Econometric Society, in Cambridge, U.K. The authors would like to thank Ariel Rubinstein, John Driffill, and several anonymous referees.

Inflation inertia may be quite tenacious because of the simultaneous interaction between policy actions and inflationary expectations under imperfect credibility. This result is particularly relevant for understanding some of the failed efforts to stabilize inflation in South America. This article deals with the issue of inertia in the framework of imperfect information about the type of the policymaker and extends the existing models to an infinite horizon. Because policymakers do not have perfect control of inflation, a "frivolous stabilizer" may deviate from the policies of a "serious stabilizer" without necessarily being unmasked immediately. When the difference in the ability of "strong" and "weak" policymakers to control inflation is large, unexpected inflation may be persistently negative for quite a while, thus causing reduced economic activity and giving the indication that credibility is low. If the policymaker persists with the stabilization, this pattern gradually disappears as his reputation rises. But before this final stage the serious policymaker has to compromise his inflation objective in view of adverse expectations about his type and pay the cost of imperfect credibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.