The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2009
The World Bank Economic Review 2009 23(2):235-267; doi:10.1093/wber/lhp006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Cholera Vaccination Programs in Beira, Mozambique
Marc Jeuland (corresponding author) is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Marcelino Lucas is director of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Mozambique; his email address is marcelin{at}zebra.uem.mz.
John Clemens is director of the International Vaccine Institute in Seoul; his email address is jclemens{at}ivi.int.
Dale Whittington is a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and at the Manchester Business School, Manchester University, UK; his email address is dwhittin{at}email.unc.edu.
Correspondence: his email address is jeuland{at}email.unc.edu.
JEL codes: I1, H23, H4
Economic and epidemiological data collected in Beira, Mozambique, are used to conduct this first social cost–benefit analysis for cholera vaccination in Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis compares the net economic benefits of three immunization strategies with and without user fees: school-based vaccination for school children only (age 5–14), school-based vaccination for all children (age 1–14), and a mass vaccination campaign for all people older than one year. All options assume the use of a low-cost new-generation oral cholera vaccine. The analysis incorporates the latest knowledge of vaccine effectiveness, including new evidence on the positive externality associated with the resulting herd protection (both protection of unvaccinated individuals and enhanced protection among vaccinated individuals arising from vaccination of a portion of the population). It also uses field data for incidence, benefits (private willingness to pay, public cost of illness), and costs (production, shipping, delivery, private travel costs). Taking herd protection into account has important economic implications. For a wide variety of parameters values, vaccination programs in Beira pass a cost–benefit test. Small school-based programs with and without user fees are very likely to provide net benefits. A mass vaccination campaign without user fees would result in the greatest reduction in the disease burden, but the social costs would likely outweigh the benefits, and such a program would require substantial public sector investment. As user fees increase, mass vaccination becomes much more attractive, and the reduction in disease burden remains above 70 percent at relatively low user fees.