Skip Navigation


The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2005
The World Bank Economic Review 2005 19(3):425-448; doi:10.1093/wber/lhi016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/425    most recent
lhi016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F15 - Economic Integration
Right arrow F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
Right arrow F21 - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
Right arrow J31 - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Has NAFTA Increased Labor Market Integration between the United States and Mexico?

Raymond Robertson

Raymond Robertson is associate professor of economics in the Department of Economics at Macalester College; his email address is robertson{at}macalester.edu.

This article analyzes three criteria for labor market integration between Mexico and the United States before and since the North American Free Trade Agreement: the responsiveness of Mexican wages to US wage shocks, the speed at which relative wages return to a long-run differential, and changes in the rate of convergence of absolute wages. Tests for increased integration using these three criteria generate mixed results, which are then explored by directly incorporating trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), and migration. The results suggest that trade and FDI did in fact positively contribute to integration but that the increase in border enforcement depressed Mexican wages, masking the positive benefits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.