Skip Navigation


The World Bank Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on August 31, 2005
The World Bank Economic Review 2005 19(2):311-333; doi:10.1093/wber/lhi007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/311    most recent
lhi007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lokshin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yemtsov, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H54 - Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock
Right arrow I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
Right arrow I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
Right arrow P28 - Natural Resources; Energy; Environment
Right arrow P36 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions: Consumer Economics; Health, Education and Training, Welfare, and Poverty
Right arrow R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Has Rural Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Georgia Helped the Poor?

Michael Lokshin

Michael Lokshin is senior economist in the Development Economics Research Group at the World Bank; his email address is mlokshin{at}w`orldbank.org.

Ruslan Yemtsov

Ruslan Yemtsov is senior economist in the Europe and Central Asia Poverty Reduction and Economic Management unit at the World Bank; his email address is ryemtsov{at}worldbank.org.

This article proposes a research strategy to deal with the scarcity of data on beneficiaries for conducting impact assessments of community-level projects. Community-level panel data from a regular household survey augmented with a special community module are used to measure the impact of projects. Propensity score–matched difference-in-difference comparisons are used to control for time-invariant unobservable factors. This methodology takes into consideration the purposeful placement of projects and their interactions at the community level. This empirical approach is applied to infrastructure rehabilitation projects—for schools, roads, and water supply systems—in rural Georgia between 1998 and 2001. The analysis produces plausible results regarding the size of welfare gains from a particular project at the village level and allows for differentiation of benefits between the poor and the nonpoor. The findings of this study can contribute to evaluations of the impact of infrastructure interventions on poverty by bringing new empirical evidence to bear on the welfare and equity implications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.