Skip Navigation

The World Bank Economic Review 2004 18(2):155-174; doi:10.1093/wber/lhh038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Right arrow D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
Right arrow E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
Right arrow O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 18, NO. 2,
© The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK 2004; all rights reserved.

The Distribution of Income Shocks during Crises: An Application of Quantile Analysis to Mexico, 1992–95

William F. Maloney, Wendy V. Cunningham, and Mariano Bosch

William F. Maloney is lead economist, Office of the Chief Economist for Latin America and the Caribbean at the World Bank; his e-mail address is wmaloney{at}worldbank.org. Wendy V. Cunningham is senior economist, Human Development Sector, Latin American and Caribbean Region at the World Bank; her e-mail address is wcunningham{at}worldbank.org. Mariano Bosch Mossi is a junior professional in the Office of the Chief Economist for Latin America and the Caribbean at the World Bank; his e-mail address is mboschmossi{at}worldbank.org.

Abstract

Moving beyond the simple comparisons of averages typical of most analyses of household income shocks, this article employs quantile analysis to generate a complete distribution of such shocks by type of household during the 1995 crisis in Mexico. It compares the distributions across normal and crisis periods to see whether observed differences were due to the crisis or are intrinsic to the household types. Alternatively, it asks whether the distribution of shocks during normal periods was a reasonable predictor of vulnerability to income shocks during crises. It finds large differences in the distribution of shocks by household types both before and during the crisis but little change in their relative positions during the crisis. The impact appears to have been spread fairly evenly. Households headed by people with less education (poor), single mothers, or people working in the informal sector do not appear to experience disproportionate income drops either in normal times or during crises.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.