Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhalotra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Heady, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J13 - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
Right arrow J43 - Agricultural Labor Markets
Right arrow J82 - Labor Force Composition
Right arrow O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Right arrow Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 17, NO. 2, 197-227
© 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK

Child Farm Labor: The Wealth Paradox

Sonia Bhalotra and Christopher Heady

Sonia Bhalotra is a Reader in Economics the University of Bristol (U.K.). Her e-mail address is s.bhalotra{at}bris.ac.uk. Christopher Heady is Head of the Tax Policy and Statistics Division at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (Paris). His e-mail address is christopher.heady{at}oecd.org.

Abstract

This article is motivated by the remarkable observation that children of land-rich households are often more likely to be in work than the children of land-poor households. The vast majority of working children in developing economies are in agricultural work, predominantly on farms operated by their families. Land is the most important store of wealth in agrarian societies, and it is typically distributed very unequally. These facts challenge the common presumption that child labor emerges from the poorest households. This article suggests that this apparent paradox can be explained by failures of the markets for labor and land. Credit market failure will tend to weaken the force of this paradox. These effects are modeled and estimates obtained using survey data from rural Pakistan and Ghana. The main result is that the wealth paradox persists for girls in both countries, whereas for boys it disappears after conditioning on other covariates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
T. Woldehanna, N. Jones, and B. Tefera
The Invisibility of Children's Paid and Unpaid Work: Implications for Ethiopia's national poverty reduction policy
Childhood, May 1, 2008; 15(2): 177 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENTHome page
D. Jayaraj and S. Subramanian
Out of School and (Probably) in Work: Child Labour and Capability Deprivation in India
Journal of South Asian Development, July 1, 2007; 2(2): 177 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OXF ECON PAPHome page
C. Dumas
Why do parents make their children work? A test of the poverty hypothesis in rural areas of Burkina Faso
Oxf. Econ. Pap., April 1, 2007; 59(2): 301 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Developing SocietiesHome page
C. Salmon
Child Labor in Bangladesh: Are Children the Last Economic Resource of the Household?
Journal of Developing Societies, June 1, 2005; 21(1-2): 33 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.