Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gauthier, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tybout, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L60 - General
Right arrow O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Right arrow O20 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 449-472
© 2002 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

A Firm's-Eye View of Commercial Policy and Fiscal Reforms in Cameroon

Bernard Gauthier, Isidro Soloaga and James Tybout

Bernard Gauthier is Professor of Economics at the École des Hautes Études Commerciales in Montreal. His e-mail address is bernard.gauthier{at}hec.ca.
Isidro Soloaga is Professor of Economics at Universidad de las Américas-Puebla, Mexico. His e-mail address is isoloaga{at}mail.udlap.mx.
James Tybout is Professor of Economics at Pennsylvania State University and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His e-mail address is jtybout{at}psu.edu.

Abstract

After decades of high trade restrictions, fiscal distortions, and currency overvaluation, Cameroon implemented important commercial and fiscal policy reforms in 1994. Almost simultaneously, a major devaluation cut the international price of Cameroon's currency in half. This article examines the effects of those reforms on the incentive structure faced by manufacturing firms. Did the reforms create a coherent new set of signals? Did they reduce dispersion in tax burdens? Was the net effect to stimulate the production of tradable goods? The results of applying a cost function decomposition to detailed firm-level panel data suggest that the reforms created clear new signals for manufacturers, as effective protection rates fell by 80 to 120 percentage points. In contrast, neither the tax reforms nor the devaluation had a major systematic effect on profit margins. The devaluation did shift relative prices dramatically in favor of exportable goods, causing exporters to grow relatively rapidly.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.