Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balzarotti, V.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
Right arrow O16 - Economic Development: Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 197-212
© 2002 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank


Financial Crises, Credit Ratings, and Bank Failures

On the Use of Portfolio Risk Models and Capital Requirements in Emerging Markets: The Case of Argentina

Veronica Balzarotti, Michael Falkenheim and Andrew Powell

Veronica Balzarotti is manager of the Regulatory Policy Department with the Central Bank of Argentina. Michael Falkenheim is a financial economist with the Office of Management and Budget of the United States and a former Research Economist in the Research Department of the Central Bank of Argentina. Andrew Powell is Professor at Universidad Torcuato Di Tella and former Chief Economist at the Central Bank of Argentina. Their e-mail addresses are vbalzarotti{at}bcra.gov.ar, Michael_C._Falkenheim{at}omb.eop.gov, and apowell{at}utdt.edu, respectively.

Abstract

A portfolio-based model (CreditRisk+ of Credit Suisse First Boston) and recent Central Bank of Argentina credit bureau data are used to estimate whether current capital and provisioning regulations match actual risks. Arguing that provisions should cover expected losses and that capital requirements should cover potential losses beyond expected losses subject to some statistical level of tolerance, the article assesses how well actual capital and provisioning requirements match the estimated requirements given by the model. Actual provisioning requirements were found to be close to implied levels of expected losses. The estimate of potential losses was found to be highly sensitive to the assumptions of the model, especially the parameter relating the volatility of a loan's rate of default to its mean value. This volatility parameter cannot be estimated accurately with the credit bureau data because of the short time span covered, so proxy data were used to estimate it, and two values around that estimate were tried. The difficulty of estimating this critical parameter implies that the results should only be regarded as suggestive. Moreover, the methodology only seeks to estimate credit risk and not interest rate risk or exchange rate risk, nor does it fully take into account the indirect effects of interest rates and exchange rates on credit risk. As recent events in Argentina have demonstrated, estimating credit risk along these lines should be thought of as just one tool in attempting to assess the appropriate level of bank provisions and capital.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.