Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, C.
Right arrow Articles by Neagu, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F14 - Country and Industry Studies of Trade
Right arrow L12 - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
Right arrow L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 16, NO. 1, 81-108
© 2002 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank


Article

Trade in International Maritime Services: How Much Does Policy Matter?

Carsten Fink, Aaditya Mattoo and Ileana Cristina Neagu

Carsten Fink, Aaditya Mattoo, and Ileana Cristina Neagu are with the Development Research Group at the World Bank. Their e-mail addresses are cfink{at}worldbank.org, amattoo{at}worldbank.org, and ineagu{at}worldbank.org, respectively.

Abstract

Maritime transport costs significantly impede international trade. This article examines why these costs are so high in some countries and quantifies the importance of two explanations: restrictive trade policies and private anticompetitive practices. It finds that both matter, but the latter have a greater impact. Trade liberalization and the breakup of private carrier agreements would lead to an average of one-third lower liner transport prices and to cost savings of up to US$3 billion on goods carried to the United States alone. The policy implications are clear: there is a need not only for further liberalization of government policy but also for strengthened international disciplines on restrictive business practices. The authors propose an approach to developing such disciplines in the current round of services negotiations at the World Trade Organization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.