Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keller, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F14 - Country and Industry Studies of Trade
Right arrow O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
Right arrow O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2000 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

Do Trade Patterns and Technology Flows Affect Productivity Growth?

Wolfgang Keller

the Department of Economics at the University of Texas, Austin and the National Bureau for Economic Research keller{at}eco.utexas.edu

This article presents a model suggesting that the pattern of a country's intermediate goods imports affects its level of productivity because a country that imports such goods primarily from technological leaders receives more technology than a country that imports primarily from follower countries. The importance of trade patterns in determining technology flows is quantified using industry-level data for machinery goods imports and productivity from eight member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development between 1970 and 1991. Three conclusions emerge from this work. First, the eight countries studied appear to benefit more from domestic research and development (R&D) than from R&D of the average foreign country. Second, conditional on technology diffusion from domestic R&D, a country's import composition matters only if it is strongly biased toward or away from technological leaders. Third, differences in technology inflows related to the pattern of imports explain about 20 percent of the total variation in productivity growth. The implications of these findings for developing countries are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
F. Castellacci
Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth
Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 1105 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
F. Bickenbach and E. Bode
Evaluating the Markov Property in Studies of Economic Convergence
International Regional Science Review, July 1, 2003; 26(3): 363 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.