Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, F. H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Litchfield, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1999 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

Calm After the Storms: Income Distribution and Welfare in Chile, 1987–94

Francisco H. G. Ferreira and Julie A. Litchfield

Francisco H. G. Ferreira is with the Economics Department at the Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, and Julie A. Litchfield is with the Economics Department at the University of Sussex. Their e-mail addresses are fferreira@econ.puc-rio.br and j.a.litchfield@sussex.ac.uk. The authors are grateful to Dante Contreras, Indermit Gill, Jesko Hentschel, Osvaldo Larranaga, Chris Scott, Tony Shorrocks, Miguel Szekely, Alberto Valdes, Michael Walton, two anonymous referees, and participants at conferences in Santiago and London for their very useful comments and contributions. The authors particularly wish to thank Iris Delgado at MIDEPLAN and Juan Carlos Feres at CEPAL for being so generous with their vast knowledge of the details of the CASEN data.

After rising during most—but not all—of the 1960–85 period, inequality in Chile seems to have stabilized since around 1987. Following the stormy period of economic and political reforms of the 1970s and 1980s, no statistically significant Lorenz dominance results could be detected since 1987. Scalar measures of inequality confirm this picture of stability, but suggest a slight change in the shape of the density function, with some compression at the bottom being "compensated for" by a stretching at the top. As inequality remained broadly stable, sustained economic growth led to substantial welfare improvements and poverty reduction, according to a range of measures and with respect to three different poverty lines. Poverty mixed stochastic dominance tests confirm this result. All of these findings are robust to different choices of equivalence scales.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.