Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Lassibille, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1999 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

Student Outcomes in Philippine Elementary Schools: An Evaluation of Four Experiments

Jee-Peng Tan, Julia Lane, and Gerard Lassibille

Jee-Peng Tan is with the Human Development Network at the World Bank, Julia Lane is with the Urban Institute, and Gerard Lassibille is with the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Dijon, France. The authors' e-mail addresses are jtan{at}worldbank.org, jlane{at}ui.urban.org and gerard.lassibille{at}u-bourgogne.fr. The authors thank Ms. Lidi Santos and her staff at the Bureau of Elementary Education of the Philippines Department of Education, Culture, and Sports for facilitating access to the data, the World Bank's Research Department for partial financial support, Alain Mingat for helpful discussions on the analytical method, and three anonymous referees for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts.

Policymakers in most developing countries are concerned about high dropout rates and poor student learning in primary education. The government of the Philippines initiated the Dropout Intervention Program in 1990–92 as part of its effort to address these issues. Under this program, four experimental interventions were randomly assigned to 20 schools in selected low-income areas. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected from these schools, as well as from 10 control schools, in order to evaluate the program's impact on dropout behavior and student learning. The economic justification for replication appears to be strongest for the interventions that provided teachers with learning materials, which helped them to pace lessons according to students' differing abilities, and that initiated parent-teacher partnerships, which involved parents in the schooling of their children. The justification was weakest for the school feeding intervention. In addition to the results specific to the Philippines, this research demonstrates the feasibility of monitoring and evaluating interventions in the education sector in other developing countries, including the use of randomized control designs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic ResearchHome page
T. K. Sen
Performance Measurement in Social Sectors
Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, July 1, 2007; 1(3): 299 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.