Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravallion, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
Right arrow I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?

Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen

Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen are with the Policy Research Department at the World Bank. This project received financial assistance from the World Bank's Poverty and Social Policy Department and the joint British-Dutch-Swedish trust fund for studying the social and environmental consequences of growth-oriented policies. For discussions on this topic and comments on the paper, the authors are grateful to Gaurav Datt, Jyotsna Jalan, Emmanuel Jimenez, Michael Lipton, Oey Meesook, Binayak Sen, Lynne Sherburne-Benz, Dominique van de Walle, Quentin Wodon, participants at various presentations, and three anonymous referees.

It has been claimed that in recent times the poor have lost ground, both relatively and absolutely, even when average levels of living have risen. This article tests that claim using household surveys for 67 developing and transitional economies over 1981–94. It finds that changes in inequality and polarization were uncorrelated with changes in average living standards. Distribution improved as often as it worsened in growing economies, and negative growth was often more detrimental to distribution than positive growth. Overall, there was a small decrease in absolute poverty, although with diverse experiences across regions and countries. Almost always, poverty fell with growth in average living standards and rose with contraction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South Asia Economic JournalHome page
U. R. Wagle
How Have the Poor in South Asia Fared between 1980 and 2004? An Assessment of Living Conditions
South Asia Economic Journal, September 1, 2008; 9(2): 261 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Afr EconHome page
J. Page
Strategies for Pro-poor Growth: Pro-poor, Pro-growth or Both?
J. Afr. Econ., December 1, 2006; 15(4): 510 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Asian and African StudiesHome page
C. S. Dolan
Benevolent Intent? The Development Encounter in Kenya's Horticulture Industry
Journal of Asian and African Studies, December 1, 2005; 40(6): 411 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
South Asia Economic JournalHome page
T. Tambunan
Economic Growth, Appropriate Policies and Poverty Reduction in a Developing Country: Some Experience from Indonesia
South Asia Economic Journal, March 1, 2005; 6(1): 59 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.