|
B13 - Neoclassical through 1925
Contributing journals to this collection:
Review of Finance,
European Review of Agriculture Economics,
The World Bank Economic Review,
Journal of Economic Geography,
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,
American Law and Economics Review,
Industrial and Corporate Change,
CESifo Economic Studies,
The Review of Financial Studies,
Contributions to Political Economy,
Journal of Financial Econometrics,
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Journal of African Economies,
Socio-Economic Review,
Oxford Economic Papers,
The World Bank Research Observer,
Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
Cambridge Journal of Economics,
Journal of Competition Law and Economics,
and Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Citations 11-19 of 19 total displayed.
- Articles
The relevance of the Marshallian concept of normality in interior and inertial dynamics as revisited by Shackle and Kornai
- Mehrdad Vahabi
Camb. J. Econ. 1998; 22: 547-572.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
- Articles
The economics calculation debate: lessons for socialists
- Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine
Camb. J. Econ. 1996; 20: 523-537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
- Articles
Pigou and future generations: a Cambridge tradition
- David Collard
Camb. J. Econ. 1996; 20: 585-597.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
- Articles
Marshall's theory of value: the role of external economies
- Neil Hart
Camb. J. Econ. 1996; 20: 353-369.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
- Articles
Increasing returns and competitive equilibriumthe content and development of Marshall's theory
- Renee Prendergast
Camb. J. Econ. 1992; 16: 447-462.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
- NOTES AND COMMENTS
Problems in reconciling neoclassical and Marxian models of production: a comment on Green
- David Young
Camb. J. Econ. 1992; 16: 101-107.
[PDF]
- NOTES AND COMMENTS
Neoclassical and Marxian models of production: a reply to Young
- Francis Green
Camb. J. Econ. 1992; 16: 109-111.
[PDF]
- research-article
MARSHALL'S POSITION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC THEORY
- GIANCARLO DE VIVO
Contrib. Pol. Economy 1992; 11: 67-84.
[PDF]
- Articles
Jevons's blunder concerning value and distribution: an explanation
- Michael V. White
Camb. J. Econ. 1991; 15: 149-160.
[PDF]
|
|